Tuesday, January 17, 2006 MANILA, PHILIPPINES
Open House
E-Mail and the process of electronic discovery
By RONNIE LATINAZO EMC Philippines Country Manager
While e-mail may be a crucial application, poorly archived e-mail can kill a business. During a recent prescription drug antitrust case in the US, the plaintiff demanded a discovery search of 30 million pages of e-mail stored on the defendant’s backup tapes for names of particular individuals. The defendant suggested the plaintiff shoulder the cost of compiling, formatting, searching, eliminating duplicates, and retrieving the requested e-mail. Sadly, the defendant lost the argument and the court found the burdensome and expensive discovery process was the defendant’s problem because of a bad e-mail retrieval process. The defendant, in the process, paid a hefty amount for consulting and legal fees.
Electronic discovery is a process used by the legal industry to search email documents. This involves the retrieval and use of electronic records of companies such as evidences of business transactions that enable companies to support current and future management decisions, satisfy client obligations, achieve regulatory compliance and protect against adverse legal actions.
In the United States and Europe, a number of federal and state laws and regulations cover records retention and how they should be stored.
Increasingly, said regulations focus on the process by which records are maintained over time in order to ensure the accuracy, and integrity of such records.
Soon, the same compliance may be applied in the Philippines, as the government learns and appreciates the value of setting the groundwork for similar regulations for local companies.
Court cases routinely approve discovery motions to sift through electronic documents, especially ubiquitous e-mail. The consequences of NOT having the information available or being able to access it in a reasonable amount of time may be severe. Despite this, few companies have enforceable records retention policies and fewer still have the technology tools needed to support it.
Another problem is keeping e-mail you don’t legally have to keep, as Microsoft found out. The smoking gun e-mail surfaced during the discovery phase of Microsoft’s antitrust trial, even though it was AOL’s e-mail, not Microsoft’s. The Justice Department found one of Gates’ own e-mails with the undying line: "We have to make sure that we don’t allow them to promote Netscape."
Electronic discovery isn’t just for enterprise corporations. Mid-sized companies frequently experience legal discovery, so if it hasn’t happened to an individual business it almost certainly will. So how can organizations best prepare for electronic discovery? By balancing risk against cost �- in essence; it’s establishing policies and capabilities for efficiently accessing secure archives without breaking the bank.
MANAGING THE ARCHIVE FOR DISCOVERY
Companies should begin by establishing and enforcing retention policies, including policies against destroying or altering data potentially relevant to discovery motions. This goes double for destroying or altering data after discovery or litigation starts. Seems obvious, but over the last few years we’ve heard about executives being indicted for deleting messages pointing to insider trading. Not only did federal investigators recover the deleted messages, they tacked on additional serious charges. Archiving procedures must support evidentiary measures and record retention policies must be in writing and enforced with a method to prove regular enforcement.
This is a tall order and its success depends on a cost-effective technology to support electronic discovery for messaging files. This strategy hinges on two major elements: managing cost and managing risk. A balance between the two yields a cost-effective technology for managing messaging archives and enforcing records retention.
MANAGING COST
Managing cost includes reining in storage costs, improving operational efficiency and company productivity, and decreasing retrieval/discovery costs.
Until recently companies were limited to first-generation archiving applications. These applications backed up incremental or full copies of data to backup media. With no way to manage duplicate copies of data and an awkward and time-consuming retrieval process, archiving would complicate discovery procedures and significantly increase cost.
In fact, storing e-mail alone often represents over 40% of an organization’s storage costs because of both the sheer volume of e-mails and the multiple copies of messages that are retained.
New archive applications are engineered to compare e-mail messages, record and validate the original, and eliminate duplicates across multiple messaging servers. E-mail archives can now take up a fraction of the storage space previously used, allowing companies to shrink the amount of backup media, backup windows, and retrieval time. These archiving apps are also capable of rapid searches based on a number of parameters, letting organizations quickly retrieve detailed e-mail subsets in response to a discovery demand.
MANAGING RISK
Managing risk includes keeping a complete archive, enforcing retention policies, proving authenticity and evidentiary weight, and maintaining security and privacy.
Poor archive retrieval systems are extremely time-consuming and costly due to their big-dump approach -� archive everything and hope for the best. This results in huge volumes of badly indexed messages, an awkward and labor-intensive retrieval process, and no way to prove the archived media’s integrity.
Next-generation e-mail archive management can audit and report on all archive access and operations, automatically run retention schedules, and capture and index all messaging data, including attachments and IMs. It should also allow for real-time data capture, monitor user information and support privacy by protecting user access.
Being unprepared for electronic discovery can be disastrous, resulting in thousands of hours of employee labor and millions of dollars in consulting and legal fees. It’s vital that companies develop, audit, and enforce electronic discovery policies and invest in supporting technology from companies like EMC. Protecting, auditing, and producing information on-demand not only allows organizations to protect themselves during litigation, but also supports strategic business goals by cost-effectively managing critical business information.
E-mail this to a friendPrinter-friendly versionCurrent stories
News
French group to capitalize on weak ad spending via online unitVirtual PCs free workers from hardwareOthers
Philippine Silicon Valley:
Optimism and the entrepreneurOvum Research:
- DSL drives business worldwide- Momentum continues to build for mobile device managementOpen House:
The data centerTest Drive:
Olympus E-3 deliversGlobal Knowledge:
Master hacking technologiesMentorNet from Peso:
Raising the competitiveness of the Philippine outsourcing industryI.T. Indicators:
More electronics exports processed through automated system — NSO data Law-tech Ideas:
The value added of VoIP-->
Features
Video games getting minds of their ownUbisoft video game targets girl athletesDC Universe players invent their own video game superheroesVideo games getting more socialInnovative Germans let others make the profitsE-books read well, but paper’s more palatableIntellectual property plays key role in nations’ wealth creationSafekeeping creations of the mind helps foster creativity, innovationSecuring a patentProtecting your domain nameHigh costs breed digital piracyDigital disturbiaDigital films in focusMicrochips to end the madness?Online game publisher introduces ’advergaming’ conceptThe Pinoy bloggerManaging and mobilizing informationSmokey Mountain: Alleviating poverty with technology’s help’Eye for precision, readiness to work hard & (at times) readiness to be underpaid’Wanted: data privacy lawSunshine ventures in outsourcingThe Fixed Income Exchange: Tapping IT to democratize RP’s capital marketIT stocks: Listing surge imminent?I.T. Matters main page